Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 N.J. Super. 430 - Kode Harbor Dev. Assoc. v. Atlantic

230 N.J. Super. 430 - Kode Harbor Dev. Assoc. v. Atlantic’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 2011
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently June 2011

14 state decisions

801989199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on County of Bergen v. Port of New York Authority · New Jersey Builders Ass'n v. Mayor of Bernards Township · Longridge Builders v. Planning Bd. of Princeton Tp. · Union County Board of Chosen Freeholders v. Union County Park Commission · Divan Builders v. Planning Bd. Tp. of Wayne

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] county's powers are restricted to those granted to it by the Legislature.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “in this subsection leads us to conclude that the County's power to regulate subdivisions extends beyond those developments abutting a county road. The second portion of the quoted sentence gives the County power to impose conditions of approval upon subdivisions, wherever located, that are determined to have an impact upon the safety and convenience of the traveling public. Thus, there is a significant distinction between sections 6.2 and 6.6, but not simply because one uses the phrase”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “legislative design to grant broader authority to county planning boards in the context of their review of site plans than they possess in their consideration of subdivisions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.