Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 PASUPER 533 - Anderson v. Uva

Anderson v. Uva’s Empirical Analysis

1974

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
August 1984
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Caplan v. Keystone Weaving Mills, Inc. · 224 Pa. Super. 552 - Slezynger v. Bischak · Smith Estate · Helsel v. RODGERS · Tyson v. BASEHORE

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when appellees objected to the service of process, they in effect questioned the propriety of both jurisdiction over their persons and venue. After dismissing the complaint on the basis of either lack of personal jurisdiction or improper venue, the court below should have transferred the case to Bucks County where venue could be properly laid. 10”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.