230 So. 2d 209 - King v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
1
states following
February 1988
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Preston v. United States · Barnett v. United States · 199 So. 2d 635 - May v. State · Martin v. State · Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“We are of the opinion that the defendant was not prejudiced by being required to exhibit his arm to the jury while he was on the witness stand testifying in his own defense. The appellant voluntarily took the witness stand and, being a witness, he was required to answer questions on cross examination related to the issue. McCormick on Evidence § 131, page 274 (1954); 8 Wigmore on Evidence § 2265 (McNaughton rev. 1961), page 386; Tyson v. State, 237 Miss. 149 , 112 So.2d 563 (1959); People v. Widener, 220 Cal. App.2d 826 , 34 Cal. Rptr. 130 (1963). ( 230 So.2d at 211-12 ).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.