230 So. 2d 217 - Hendrieth v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1989
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Schmerber v. State of California · Slaughter v. Holsomback · Patty v. State · Hydrick v. State · Smith v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When the fact of killing, with all its attendant circumstances, is clearly proved, and the testimony either shows express malice, or that there was no malice at all, there is no room for presumption. But in cases where the killing is proved, and no accompanying circumstances appear in the evidence, the law presumes the killing was done maliciously.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carleton v. State“That every killing is presumed to be malicious, and amounting to murder, until the contrary appears from the circumstances of alleviation, excuse, or justification; and that it is incumbent upon the defendant to make out such circumstances to the satisfaction of the jury unless they arise out of the evidence produced against him.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The Court instructs the jury that malice aforethought mentioned in the indictment in this case may be presumed from the unlawful and deliberate use of a deadly weapon.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Carleton v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.