Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 So. 2d 759 - Patrick v. Patrick

230 So. 2d 759 - Patrick v. Patrick’s Empirical Analysis

1970

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
September 2001
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently September 2001

1 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

801970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Harris · 121 So. 2d 851 - De Rouen v. Aiavolasiti · 52 La. Ann. 1517 - Lafourche Transportation Co. v. Pugh · Downs v. Delco-Light Co. · 27 So. 2d 925 - Phares v. Courtney

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Judgments on the pleadings and summary judgments shall not be granted in any action for divorce, separation from bed and board, or annulment of marriage, nor in any case where the community, paraphernal, or dotal rights may be involved in an action between husband and wife.””
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““(a) The rules set forth in this article were taken directly from the Pleading and Practice Act, former R.S. 13:3601(4), under which they apply only to the motion for judgment on the pleadings. These rules were extended to the motion for summary judgment to prevent collusive judgments under the motion for summary judgment in divorce actions and other suits involving the rights of married women.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.