Ex parte Veteto’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 515 So. 2d 704 - Ex Parte Rudolph · Ex Parte Mercury Finance Corp. of Ala. · 789 So. 2d 243 - Leeth v. Jim Walter Homes, Inc. · 588 So. 2d 889 - Lockett v. A.L. Sandlin Lumber Co. · Metcalf v. Pentagon Federal Credit Union
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"[P]etitions for the writ of mandamus that do not comply with Rule 21(a)(1)(E) by failing to include certain materials, such as court orders and other parts of the record essential to our consideration of the request for relief, are due to be dismissed. Without such materials this court is unable to conduct a meaningful review or to grant the relief sought in the petition. In other words, without providing this court with such materials, a petitioner is unable to demonstrate that he or she has a clear legal right to the relief requested."”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[I]t is the duty of this court to review the propriety of orders and judgments made in the trial court; this court cannot issue rulings on the motions pending before the trial court.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“copies of any order or opinion or parts of the record that would be essential to an understanding of the matters set forth in the petition.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.