McCray v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 436 So. 2d 93 - Combs v. State · 365 So. 2d 701 - Castor v. State · 471 So. 2d 32 - Tillman v. State · 801 So. 2d 101 - Florida Dept. of Transp. v. Juliano · Wade v. Clower
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[T]he proper course when an incompetent defendant does not meet the criteria for commitment[] and cannot be restored to competency[] is for the State to initiate civil commitment proceedings under the Baker Act or for the court to release the defendant 'on appropriate conditions' as provided in [r]ule 3.212(d).”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“Should the trial court find that there is not a substantial probability that the petitioner will attain competency in the foreseeable future, the trial court shall release the petitioner under appropriate conditions pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.212(d) if the State does not initiate involuntary civil commitment proceedings.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[C]ertiorari review is proper when it is alleged that the circuit court's interpretation of a statute violates clearly established law or when it fails to follow the dictates of a statute[] and the error is sufficiently egregious as to result in a miscarriage of justice.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.