Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 SW2D 335 - King v. King

King v. King’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
May 1990
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 1990

9 state decisions

3019501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Roy v. Whitaker · Nass v. Nass · Morrow v. Ft. Worth & D. C. Ry. Co. · Nass v. Nass · Yeager v. Bradley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It may be further observed that, although the powers of an independent executor are not as restricted as those of a duly appointed administrator, the estate is still subject to the jurisdiction of the probate court and the control of an estate by an independent executor is no less an administration than it would be if such person were acting under the full control of the court. Roy v. Whitaker, 92 Tex. 346 , 48 S.W. 892 , 49 S.W. 367 , and Simians Administration of Estates in Texas, 3d Ed., Section 128, page 171.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is our opinion that the article provides for the appointment of a temporary administrator in such cases, when an administration does not already exist, and then to serve only until ‘the appointment of an executor or administrator with full powers’ has been made. In the case at bar an independent executor with full powers to act had already been appointed and he had qualified as such and was serving with full power when appellees sought to have temporary administrator appointed.” [Emphasis added.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.