Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 SW3D 77 - State v. Holman

State v. Holman’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Grim · State v. Silvey · State v. Whalen · State v. Crawford · State v. Presberry

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “‘is required to take the evidence in the light most favorable to the State and to grant the State all reasonable inferences from the evidence. The Court disregards contrary inferences, unless they are such a natural and logical extension of the evidence that a reasonable juror would be unable to disregard them.’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “It is Appellant's duty to compile the record on appeal which should contain all of the exhibits and evidence necessary for this Court’s determination of the questions presented.” State v. Holman, 230 S.W.3d 77 , 79 n. 4 (Mo.App. S.D.2007) (citing Rule 30.04).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.