Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 U.S. 165 - Nalle v. Oyster

Nalle v. Oyster’s Empirical Analysis

230 U.S. 165 · 1913

Citation profile

250
cited by 250 later decisions
22
cited 22 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
January 2013
most recently cited

122 federal appellate · 35 district · 34 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 250 later decisions (22 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 2013 · most notably Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974), Herbert v. Lando (1979)

122 federal appellate · 35 district · 34 state decisions — followed in 11 states

70019131920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals)

Relationships

Relies on Cromwell v. County of Sac · Southern Pacific Railroad v. United States · Bradley v. Fisher · Spalding v. Vilas · Russell v. Place

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 250 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The practice of bills of exception is statutory. By the ancient common law a writ of error lay only for an error in law apparent upon the judgment roll —what is now called the ‘strict record’ — or for an error in fact, such as the death of a party before judgment. See Green v. Watkins, 6 Wheat. 260 , 262 [ 5 L. Ed. 256 ]. Eor an erroneous decision that did not appear upon the record there was no redress by writ of error.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The questions raised by the other demurrers need not long detain us. The established rule is that if the parties in the former action be the same as in the present, then every matter and question of fact and of law that was necessarily involved in the consideration and determination of the former issue shall be conclusive upon the present.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “well settled * * * that no civil action lies for a conspiracy unless there be an overt act that results in damage to the plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.