230 Wis. 2d 730 - State v. Shimek’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 158 Wis. 2d 458 - State v. Johnson · 60 Wis. 2d 121 - Libke v. State · 225 Wis. 2d 271 - State v. Kivioja · 152 Wis. 2d 284 - State v. Shanks · 193 Wis. 2d 373 - State v. Nawrocke
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[H]aste and confusion in entering the plea”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The liberal rule for withdrawal of a guilty plea before sentence is consistent with the efficient administration of criminal justice. It reduces the number of appeals contesting the "knowing and voluntariness" of a guilty plea, and avoids the difficulties of disentangling such claims. It also ensures that a defendant is not denied a right to trial by jury unless he clearly waives it.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jenkins“Thus, we will uphold a discretionary decision if the [trial] court reached a reasonable conclusion based on the proper legal standard and a logical interpretation of the facts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Jenkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.