Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 230 W. Va. 193 - State v. Farley

230 W. Va. 193 - State v. Farley’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 2014
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Katz v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Coolidge v. New Hampshire · Sedillo v. United States · 151 W. Va. 158 - Morgan v. Price

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the emergency doctrine may be said to permit a limited, warrantless search or entry of an area by police officers where (1) there is an immediate need for their assistance in the protection of human life, (2) the search or entry by the officers is motivated by an emergency, rather than by an intent to arrest or secure evidence, and (3) there is a reasonable connection between the emergency and the area in question.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[ejxamples of recognized exceptions to the general warrant requirement include certain brief investigatory stops, searches incident to a valid arrest, seizures of items in plain view, searches and seizures justified by exigent circumstances, consensual searches, and searches in which the special needs of law enforcement make the probable cause and warrant requirements impracticable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.