Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

231 Ala. 10

163 So 362

Daniel v. Ormand

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 27, 1935

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1935-06-27

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1961

1 state decisions

Relies on Street v. Treadwell · Cross v. Esslinger · Black v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1935-06-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

BROWN, Justice.

¶1 The record shows, after demurrer was overruled to some of the special pleas, issue was joined on the plea of the general issue and other special pleas.

¶2 At the conclusion of the evidence the court gave the affirmative charge for the defendant.

¶3 The appeal to the Court of Appeals was prosecuted to that court on the record proper, without a bill of exceptions. It appears that the Court of Appeals has correctly disposed of the case. See Black v. Sloss-Sheffield Steel & Iron Co., 202 Ala. 506, 80 So. 794; Cross v. Esslinger, 133 Ala. 409, 32 So. 10; Street v. Treadwell et al., 203 Ala. 68, 70, 82 So. 28; Thomas v. McArdle, 207 Ala. 521, 93 So. 395.

¶4 The writ of certiorari is therefore denied.

¶5 Writ denied.

ANDERSON, C. J., and THOMAS and BOULDIN, JJ., concur.
/231/ala/10 · .json · Public domain