Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 ARK 166 - Robinson v. Williams

Robinson v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
February 1987
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently February 1987

6 state decisions

401959196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Biddle v. Biddle · Janes v. Rogers · Schramm v. Burkhart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ . . . There is no rule more firmly established than the one that fraud will not be presumed, and the burden is on the party alleging it to prove it by a preponderance of the evidence which is clear and convincing.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.