Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 ARK 249 - Motors v. Moore

Motors v. Moore’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 1979
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Cox v. Smith · J. H. Magill Lumber Co. v. Lane-White Lumber Co. · Harper v. Futrell · Hill v. Fellows

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * It has been decided by this court in numerous cases that, though the recitals as to consideration in a deed cannot be contradicted by parol evidence for the purpose of defeating the conveyance, 3 it is competent to prove by such evidence that the consideration has not been paid as recited or to establish the fact that other considerations not recited in the deed were agreed to be paid, when it does not contradict the terms of the writing. ’ ’”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.