Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 CALAPP2D 205 - Elliott v. Elliott

Elliott v. Elliott’s Empirical Analysis

1964

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
2
states following
May 2014
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently May 2014

5 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

60196419701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Ward v. Taggart · Johnson v. Clark · 61 Cal. 2d 855 - Brown Derby Hollywood Corp. v. Hatton · Edgar v. Hitch · Noble v. Noble

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The rules stated in the Restatement of this Subject depend for their validity upon certain basic assumptions in regard to what is required by justice in the various situations. In this Topic, these are stated in the form of principles. They cannot be stated as rules since either they are too indefinite to be of value in a specific case or, for historical or other reasons, they are not universally applied. They are distinguished from rules in that they are intended only as general guides for the conduct of the courts____”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Constructive trusts are creatures of equity. In dealing with them, equity will disregard mere form, and will ascertain and act on the substance of things, regarding that as done which should have been done. The determination of whether a particular transaction is unconscionable is not governed by hard and fast rules, but is committed largely to the enlightened conscience of the individual judge, subject to the revisionary action of appellate tribunals.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.