Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 CALAPP3D 288 - People v. Eilers

People v. Eilers’s Empirical Analysis

1991

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
3
states following
August 1998
most recently cited

10 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 22 Cal. 3d 258 - People v. Wheeler · 10 Cal. 3d 703 - People v. Sedeno · 25 Cal. 3d 668 - People v. Flannel · 32 Cal. 3d 307 - People v. Wickersham · 1 Cal. 3d 524 - People v. St. Martin

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “`[t]rial courts have a sua sponte duty to instruct regarding lesser included offenses because neither the defendant nor the People have a right to incomplete instructions.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.