231 Cal. App. 4th 211 - Menefield v. Foreman’s Empirical Analysis
2014
Citation profile
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 45 Cal. 3d 727 - Lungren v. Deukmejian · 29 Cal. 4th 911 - Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School District · 16 Cal. 4th 90 - People v. Ledesma · REA Enterprises v. California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission · Horsemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n v. Valley Racing Ass'n
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the request for the Adams location as a material revision, to be treated separately. The trial court rejected this argument and denied the requested relief. This is a timely appeal from the ensuing judgment. DISCUSSION I On review of a trial court's judgment on a petition for writ of mandate under Code of Civil Procedure section 1085,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“we apply the substantial evidence test to the trial court's findings of fact and exercise our independent judgment on legal issues, such as the interpretation of statutory or regulatory requirements.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.