People v. Watts’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
December 2018
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 63 Cal. 2d 740 - In Re Estrada · 33 Cal. 3d 572 - People v. Fosselman · 53 Cal. 3d 618 - People v. Cox · 10 Cal. 4th 463 - People v. Davis · People v. Francis
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The court may, in the interest of justice pursuant to Section 1385 and at the time of sentencing , strike or dismiss an enhancement otherwise required to be imposed by this section. The authority provided by this subdivision applies to any resentencing that may occur pursuant to any other law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. K.P.“On October 11, 2017, the Governor signed Senate Bill 620, which amends section 12022.53 to give trial courts the authority to strike in the interests of justice a firearm enhancement allegation found true under that statute.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. K.P.
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.