People v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2019
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Bowles v. Russell · 63 Cal. 2d 740 - In Re Estrada · People v. Daniels · 5 Cal. 4th 813 - In Re Harris · 33 Cal. 3d 158 - Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal Commission
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[I]f the Legislature wanted to provide a specific procedure via petition or motion to reopen final cases for resentencing, it could have done so. (See, e.g., §§ 1170.126, 1170.18.) It did not.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Hargis“to any resentencing that may occur pursuant to any other law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. People v. Hargis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.