State v. Daugaard’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
69 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently March 2018 · most notably State v. Montgomery (2000), State v. Dickson (2016)
69 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Brady v. State of Maryland · Chapman v. State of California · United States v. Agurs · Delaware v. Van Arsdall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A Doyle violation also encompasses a prosecutor's comment upon a defendant's statement requesting an attorney.... With respect to post- Miranda warning ... silence does not mean only muteness; it includes the statement of a desire to remain silent, as well as of a desire to remain silent until an attorney has been consulted.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The mere possibility that an item of undisclosed information might have helped the defense, or might have affected the outcome of the trial does not establish materiality in the constitutional sense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“were particularly harmful because the defendant chose to exercise his constitutional right to remain silent at trial, and did not testify.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.