Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 F.2d 370 - Electric Pipe Line, Inc. v. Fluid Systems, Inc.

Electric Pipe Line, Inc. v. Fluid Systems, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis

231 F.2d 370 · 1956

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
January 1971
most recently cited

11 federal appellate · 3 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently January 1971

11 federal appellate · 3 district ·

80195619601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 35 U.S.C. § 271

Relies on Mercoid Corporation v. Mid-Continent Inv Co · Great Lakes Equipment Co. v. Fluid Systems, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We turn to the anti-trust feature of the ease. Plaintiff’s claim is that defendant misused the Lines combination patent by ‘attempting to bring unpatented components within the protection of said Letters Patent and to control competition in the unpatented -components contrary to public policy and in violation of the anti-trust laws.’ These components include electrical transformers, thermostats, tank heaters, fuel oil heatters, panel boxes, insulated couplings and insulated flanges. While these component parts are unpatented and in a sense old and well-known, those sold by defendant are especially modified or designed for use with the ‘Lines Thermal Electric System.’ Judge Anderson found that defendant had no intention of preventing the sale of these items for use outside of its patented oil transportation system. We see no reason to disturb this finding.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.