Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

231 F.2d 516

Docket No. 12899.

Tendler v. Basiliko

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Feb. 15, 1956.

Decided March 29, 1956.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1956-03-29

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1958

5 federal appellate ·

3 counsel of record

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1956-03-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. Max Tendler, Washington, D. C., appellant pro se.

¶2Mr. J. Zitomer, Washington, D. C., filed a brief for appellant.

¶3Mr. Harry L. Ryan, Jr., Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Roger J. White-ford, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellees Basiliko.

¶4Before WILBUR K. MILLER, WASHINGTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

¶5PER CURIAM.

¶6This appeal, in essence, represents an effort by appellant to obtain relief from the terms of agreements and stipulations which he made as a result of his in*517volvement in an unfortunate real estate transaction. The questions presented were carefully considered at hearings held before three Judges of the District Court on successive motions of the parties. All concluded that appellant was not entitled to relief. We agree. The judgment appealed from will be

¶7Affirmed.

/231/f2d/516 · .json · Public domain