Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 F.2d 550 - Wihtol v. Wells

Wihtol v. Wells’s Empirical Analysis

231 F.2d 550 · 1956

Citation profile

52
cited by 52 later decisions
March 2011
most recently cited

30 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 52 later decisions — most recently March 2011 · most notably Baltimore Orioles, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'n (1986), Shaw

30 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2001956196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gay v. Parpart · Baker v. Selden · Alfred Bell & Co. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc. · Chicago Record-Herald Co. v. Tribune Ass'n

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the title of a copyrighted work should be taken into account when the same title is applied to a work [allegedly] copied from it.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. Shaw · Shaw
  2. “Accordingly, the Constitution, as so interpreted, recognizes that the standards for patents and copyrights are basically different.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.