Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

231 F.2d 659

Docket No. 7133.

Wacker v. United States

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued March 19, 1956.

Decided April 9, 1956.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1956-04-09

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1964

5 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Key passage — most relied on by later courts

““ * * * a careful examination of the record satisfies us that there is no merit whatever in the appeal and that the motion to dismiss should be granted.””

quoted by 2 later decisions, including United States v. Bebik, 220 F. Supp. 657 - United States v. Wacker

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 371

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1956-04-09

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Hugh E. Monteith, Asst. U. S. Atty., Sylva, N. C. (J. M. Baley, Jr., U. S. Atty., Asheville, N. C., on motion), in support of motion.

¶2No counsel in opposition.

¶3Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5This is an appeal from a judgment and sentence of imprisonment upon a conviction of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113 and conspiracy to commit that crime in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371, it being charged in the indictments that appellants did assault officials of the bank and put their lives in jeopardy by the use of dangerous weapons. Appellants, who were sentenced on November 23, 1955, duly noted an appeal to this court and on December 15, 1955, were allowed until February 1, 1956, to perfect their appeal but took no action to perfect it within the time allowed. The United States has filed motion to dismiss the appeal and has filed with the court a record of the proceedings in the court below.

¶6 We have examined the record and find the appeal to be entirely without merit. The defense of appellants was an alibi; but they were positively identified as being the persons who perpetrated the armed robbery of the bank and, in addition, circumstantial evidence pointed unmistakably to their guilt. Furthermore, an accomplice with whom they planned the robbery, and who came with them from Ohio to North Carolina *660to assist in the robbery, pleaded guilty and testified fully as to how it was planned and carried out by them. The questions involved. in the case were pure questions of fact, the trial was fairly conducted, the jury was correctly charged and there was nothing in the rulings of the trial judge that would warrant our disturbing the verdict of the jury or awarding a new trial. If there were any merit in the appeal, we would overrule the motion to dismiss and set the case down for hearing in view of the length of the sentences imposed; but a careful examination of the record satisfies us that there is no merit whatever in the appeal and that the motion to dismiss should be granted.

¶7Appeal dismissed.

/231/f2d/659 · .json · Public domain