Duling v. Markun’s Empirical Analysis
231 F.2d 833 · 1956
Citation profile
23 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 45 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably Aldabe v. Aldabe (1980), 168 Ind. App. 467 - Green v. Karol (1976)
23 federal appellate · 1 district · 7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 631 (Federal Magistrate Act of 1979)
Relies on King v. Order of United Commercial Travelers of America · Tozer v. Charles A. Krause Milling Co. · Jones v. Jones · Anderson v. Benson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The purpose of the first sentence of Rule 26(f) is to make it perfectly clear that by merely taking a deposition before trial a party does not thereby impose restrictions upon himself with respect to the deponent at the actual trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.