In re Sulfuric Acid Antitrust Litigation’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2022
1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act)
Relies on Duncan v. Walker · SAUCIER v. KATZ Et Al. · Crawford-El v. Britton · Louisville Gas & Electric Co. v. Coleman · United States Catholic Conference v. Abortion Rights Mobilization, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure place no prescribed time limit on the outside date for filing a motion to compel discovery. In one regard, however, a line of sorts has been sketched by a series of decisions: motions to compel filed after the close of discovery are almost always deemed untimely.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The served party has the option of providing appropriate written objections and leaving it to the party seeking discovery to file a motion to compel.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“[a]lthough a party objecting to discovery may seek a protective order or stay, it is under no obligation to do so.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.