Labauve v. Olin Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
2005
Citation profile
4 district · 7 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 9601 (§ 101 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980) · 42 U.S.C. § 9658 (§ 309 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980)
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Lewis Director Arizona Department of Corrections v. Casey · William O'sullivan v. Darren Boerckel · Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In the case of any action brought under State law for personal injury, or property damages, which are caused or contributed to by exposure to any hazardous substance, or pollutant or contaminant, released into the environment from a facility, if the applicable limitations period for such action (as specified in the State statute of limitations or under common law) provides a commencement date which is earlier than the federally required commencement date, such period shall commence at the federally required commencement date in lieu of the date specified in such State statute.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“See Cox v. American Cast Iron Pipe Co ., 784 F.2d 1546 , 1553 (11th Cir. 1986) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.