Hansen v. Siebring’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
2 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 2007
2 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Relies on Graver Tank & Mfg. Co. v. Linde Air Products Co. · Westinghouse v. Boyden Power Brake Co. · Schriber-Schroth Co. v. Cleveland Trust Co. · Imhaeuser v. Buerk · California Artificial Stone Paving Co. v. Molitor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“from manufacturing and/or selling devices which do not come within the scope of the claims of the Hansen patent. Pursuant to the consent decree, a writ of injunction was duly issued. 4 The present proceeding was instituted on February 1, 1962, by the filing of a motion for contempt in which it was alleged that defendant has”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Siebring v. Hansen“only because the defendants are content that infringement was actually at issue, that the three machines not only were mere colorable imitations of their previously enjoined Exhibit 8 type machine, but that these three machines did infringe the Hansen patent.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Siebring v. Hansen“; that defendant (Claude Siebring) has infringed upon patent 2,867,314 by manufacturing and/or selling subsequent to issue date of the patent bunk feeders coming within the scope of the claims of the Hansen patent; that defendant”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Siebring v. Hansen
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.