Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 Ga. App. 154 - Harwell v. State

231 Ga. App. 154 - Harwell v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2013

8 state decisions

60199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on White v. State · Thomas v. State · Dukes v. State · 197 Ga. App. 333 - Norman v. State · Drake v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We must give some credit to the jury for common sense, for knowing that a stun gun used in the manner it was used in this case is not an “object, device, or instrument which, when used offensively against a person, is likely to or actually does result in serious bodily injury.” It was not used to beat him over the head, for example.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.