Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 Ga. App. 899 - Tuggle v. Helms

231 Ga. App. 899 - Tuggle v. Helms’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently April 2019 · most notably 246 Ga. App. 608 - Berry v. Hamilton (2000), Howard v. Gourmet Concepts International, Inc. (2000)

28 state decisions

210199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lau's Corp., Inc. v. Haskins · Bradley Center, Inc. v. Wessner · 220 Ga. App. 318 - Brown v. Amerson · Alexander v. General Motors Corp. · Tolbert v. Duckworth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) A legal duty to conform to a standard of conduct raised by the law for the protection of others against unreasonable risks of harm; (2) a breach of this standard; (3) a legally attributable causal connection between the conduct and the resulting injury; and, (4) some loss or damage flowing to the plaintiff’s legally protected interest as a result of the alleged breach of the legal duty. 4”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Guesses or speculation which raise merely a conjecture or possibility are not sufficient to create even an inference of fact for consideration on summary judgment. A plaintiff must introduce evidence which affords a reasonable basis for the conclusion that it is more likely than not that the conduct of the defendant was a cause in fact of the result.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.