Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 Ill. App. 3d 890 - Phillips v. Johnson

231 Ill. App. 3d 890 - Phillips v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

1992

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
6
states following
April 2015
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 50 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently April 2015 · most notably S.V. v. R.V. (1996), Moriarty v. Garden Sanctuary Church of God (2000)

5 federal appellate · 50 state decisions

440199220002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 88 Ill. 2d 407 - Knox College v. Celotex Corp. · 85 Ill. 2d 161 - Nolan v. Johns-Manville Asbestos · 85 Ill. 2d 146 - Witherell v. Weimer · 79 Ill. 2d 295 - Anderson v. Wagner · DeRose v. Carswell

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"(b) An action for damages for personal injury based on childhood sexual abuse must be commenced within 2 years of the date the person abused discovers or through the use of reasonable diligence should discover that the act of childhood sexual abuse occurred and that the injury was caused by the childhood sexual abuse..."”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “the manifest injustice of requiring plaintiff to know that which is inherently unknowable”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “a statute of limitations which decreases the time in which an action may be filed should not be applied retroactively so as to instantaneously bar ... existing causes of action”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.