Henderson v. Kleinman’s Empirical Analysis
1953
Citation profile
21 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2006
21 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Stone v. Duffy · Stone v. Stone · Glansman v. Ledbetter · Scott v. Scott · New York Foundling Hospital v. Gatti
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If there is evidence to support the finding in a habeas corpus proceeding we will not disturb the judgment. It is only when a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court [is shown] that the judgment will be set aside, (citations omitted)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“If there is evidence to support the finding in a habeas corpus proceeding we will not disturb the judgment.... It is only when there has been a clear abuse of discretion by the trial court that the judgment will be set aside.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Benford v. Marvel
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.