State v. Bagby’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
31 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently June 2001 · most notably State v. Timley (1994), State v. Ruebke (1987)
31 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Warren · State v. Ralls · State v. McQueen & Hardyway · 3 Kan. App. 2d 705 - State v. Acheson · State v. Everson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘When all of the offenses are of the same general character, require the same mode of trial, the same kind of evidence and occur in the same jurisdiction the defendant may be hied upon several counts of one information or if separate informations have been filed they may be consolidated for trial at one and the same trial.’ ””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Hanks · State v. Barksdale““Declaration of a mistrial under the provisions of K.S.A. 22-3423 is a decision largely within the discretion of the trial court, and that decision will not be set aside on appeal absent a clear showing of abuse of discretion.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Pioletti
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.