Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 Kan. 694 - State v. Lilley

State v. Lilley’s Empirical Analysis

1982

Citation profile

26
cited by 26 later decisions
2
states following
April 2000
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently April 2000 · most notably State v. Bird (1985), State v. Strauch (1986)

26 state decisions

160198219902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Martin Theatres of Texas, Inc. v. Bullock · State v. Seely · State v. Fleury · State v. Gilder · State v. Moody

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““engaging in [either] of die following acts widi a child who is under 16 years of age: “(a) Sexual intercourse; or “(b) any lewd fondling or touching of die person of either the child or the offender, done or submitted to widi the intent to arouse or to satisfy the sexual desires of either die child or the offender or both.” K.S.A. 1992 Supp. 21-3503(1).”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “"When the trial court determines at a hearing that a defendant’s extrajudicial statement was freely, voluntarily and intelligently given and admits the statement into evidence at trial, the appellate court will not reverse such determination if it is supported by substantial competent evidence.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““(1) The fact that a person charged with a crime was in an intoxicated condition at the time the alleged crime was committed is a defense only if such condition was involuntary produced and rendered such person substantially incapable of knowing or understanding the wrongfulness of his conduct and of conforming his conduct to the requirements of law.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.