Fannin v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
March 1973
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The action, however, is not based on the writing. The entire agreement between the parties is set out in the petition and the writing is merely referred to as evidentiary of a part of the contract. . . . While parol evidence is inadmissible to vary or contradict the terms of a written contract, this rule does not apply where the writing only purports to express part of the contract, or is expressed in such incomplete terms as to be unintelligible.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.