Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 MASS 434 - Purchase v. Seelye

Purchase v. Seelye’s Empirical Analysis

1918

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
13
states following
October 2001
most recently cited

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently October 2001 · most notably Thompson v. Fox (1937), Milks v. McIver (1934)

13 federal appellate · 2 district · 33 state decisions — followed in 13 states

1601918192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mohr v. Williams · Pratt v. Davis · Leddy v. Barney · Gray v. Boston Elevated Railway Co. · McGarrahan v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford Railroad

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The railroad company could not be held liable because of the defendant's mistaken belief that he was operating upon some person other than the plaintiff; such a mistake was not an act of negligence which could be found to flow legitimately as a natural and probable consequence of the original injury, and a ruling in effect to the contrary could not properly have been made. * * * 12”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “act of the defendant [surgeon] * * * was a wholly wrongful, independent and intervening cause for which the original wrongdoer was in no way responsible.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.