Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 Md. 190 - Fletcher v. State

Fletcher v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
3
states following
December 2015
most recently cited

57 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 61 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently December 2015 · most notably Benton v. Maryland (1969), MacK v. State (1984)

57 state decisions

280196319701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jordan v. State · Heinze v. State · Anello v. State · Bell v. State · 41 Ala. App. 351 - Johnson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is unquestioned that a finding of guilty on two inconsistent counts is invalid. Thus, where a defendant is charged in one count with larceny and in another count with receiving stolen goods, and it plainly appears that the property alleged to have been stolen is that also alleged to have been received, a general verdict of guilty is fatally defective, because in law a thief cannot be guilty of the crime of receiving stolen goods which he himself has stolen, and a guilty receiver of stolen goods cannot himself be the thief and hence the defendant could not be guilty on both counts.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.