Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 MINN 343 - Flemming v. Thorson

Flemming v. Thorson’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
1
states following
August 1975
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently August 1975

20 state decisions

120195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 147 Ohio St. 416 - Weis v. Weis · Commonwealth v. Harris · Mattfeld v. Nester · Schmidt v. Schmidt · State v. Soltau

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We hold that under the facts and circumstances here the records were not admissible with the notation stamped thereon to the effect that plaintiff was to be held for the police. Our reasons are (1) that there was no showing that the notation ‘Hold for Police’ was made in the regular course of business or that it pertained to the business of hospitalization and recording acts, transactions, occurrences, or events incident to the treatment of the patient; and (2) that the notation on the record was in no way germane to the condition for which plaintiff was hospitalized and was being treated. Here, we have a situation where one part of the hospital record pertained to the treatment the patient received for his injuries and the other part referred to holding the patient for the police, a matter which had nothing to do with the physical condition of plaintiff and which could only tend to create a prejudicial feeling as to him so far as the jury was concerned. As was said in Commonwealth v. Harris, 351 Pa. 331 , 41 A. (2d) 691, ‘Hospital business and police business are two different things.’ ” 231 Minn. 349 , 43 N. W. 2d 229 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““A record of an act, condition, or event shall, in so far as relevant, be competent evidence if the custodian or other qualified witness testifies to its identity and the mode of its preparation, and if it was made in the regular course of business, at or near the time of the act, condition, or event, and if, in the opinion of the court, the sources of information, method, and time of preparation were such as to justify its admission.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The term ‘business’ shall include every kind of business, profession, occupation, calling or operation of institutions, whether carried on for profit or not.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.