Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 MINN 90 - Dose v. Yager

Dose v. Yager’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
October 1971
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 1971

3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions

70195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nees v. Minneapolis Street Railway Co. · Mahowald v. Beckrich · Brown v. Murphy Transfer & Storage Co. · City of Minneapolis v. Canterbury · Faunce v. Searles

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The driver of a vehicle shall stop as required by this chapter at the entrance to a through highway and shall yield the right of way to other vehicles which have entered the intersection from the through highway or which are approaching so closely on the through highway as to constitute an immediate hazard, but the driver having so yielded may proceed, and the drivers of all other vehicles approaching the intersection on the through highway shall yield the right of way to the vehicles so proceeding into or across the through highway.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““* * * in any event, the jury might well have found that the surrounding circumstances would give notice to a person of ordinary prudence that the warning of the stop sign might be ignored. If so, the driver should act accordingly and take appropriate precautions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Reduced speed required. The driver of any vehicle shall, consistent with the requirements, drive at an appropriate reduced speed when approaching and crossing an intersection * * *.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.