Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 Mo. App. 521 - Huber v. Paradise

231 Mo. App. 521 - Huber v. Paradise’s Empirical Analysis

1937

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
May 2004
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 210 Mo. App. 98 - Ferry v. Woody · Frick Co. v. Caffery

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the issues in this case, the plaintiffs were required in order to recover to show by legal and competent evidence that they were the ... owners of the note sued on; and, it appearing that they have not so done, this case must be determined against them for that reason.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.