Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 N.C. 629 - Carson v. Doggett

Carson v. Doggett’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently December 2016 · most notably State v. Harris (1971), 194 N.C. App. 1 - Strickland v. Hedrick (2008)

58 state decisions

2401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on West v. Cabell · Bundy v. . Powell · State v. Palmer · Lowndes v. Board of Trustees of the Town of Huntington · Winfield v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he existence of circumstances and facts sufficiently strong to excite, in a reasonable mind, suspicion that the person charged with having been guilty, was guilty. It is a case of apparent guilt as contradistinguished from real guilt. It is not essential, that there should be positive evidence at the time the action is commenced, but the guilt should be so apparent at the time, as would be sufficient ground to induce a rational and prudent man, who duly regards the rights of others, as well as his own, to institute a prosecution; not that he knows the facts necessary to ensure a conviction, but that there are known to him sufficient grounds to suspect that the person he charges was guilty of the offence.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.