Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 Neb. 207 - State v. Jackson

State v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis

1989

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
June 2006
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 2006

21 state decisions

100198919902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States · State v. Borchardt · State v. Archbold

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “At the request of a party the judge shall order witnesses excluded so that they cannot hear the testimony of other witnesses, and he may make the order on his own motion. This rule does not authorize exclusion of (1) a party who is a natural person, or (2) an officer or employee of a party which is not a natural person designated as its representative by its attorney, or (3) a person whose presence is shown by a party to be essential to the presentation of his cause.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Favorable evidence is material, and constitutional error results from its suppression by the State, if there is a reasonable probability that, had the evidence been disclosed to the defense, the result of the proceeding would have been different. ... A reasonable probability of a different result is accordingly shown when the State’s evidentiary suppression undermines confidence in the outcome of the trial.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.