Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

231 Neb. 280

Mausbach v. Mausbach

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 24, 1989

Nebraska Supreme Court · decided 1989-02-24

Relies on State v. Antillon · Decker v. Decker

Decided 1989-02-24

Per Curiam.

¶1The petitioner, Eugene L. Mausbach, appeals the division of property, alimony order, and allowance of an attorney fee in this dissolution proceeding.

¶2As required in cases of this nature, we have reviewed the record de novo to determine whether the district court abused its discretion in dividing the property, granting an amount of alimony, and allowing an attorney fee. See Decker v. Decker, 229 Neb. 347, 426 N.W.2d 533 (1988).

¶3We determine that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in either the division of assets or its award of alimony and attorney fee. Accordingly, the decree of the trial court is affirmed. The request for attorney fees in this court is denied.

¶4Affirmed.

/231/neb/280 · .json · Public domain