State v. Sutton’s Empirical Analysis
1989
Citation profile
52 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 54 later decisions — most recently April 2024 · most notably State v. Hankins (1989), State v. Prahin (1990)
52 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Braunfeld v. Gibbons · William C. Drummond v. United States of America, Alphonse Vincent Castaldi v. United States · State v. Lenz · State v. Jackson · State v. Methe
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 54 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The right of cross-examination is an essential and fundamental requirement of a fair trial, and a defendant is entitled to engage in searching and wide-ranging cross-examination, including anything tending to affect the accuracy, veracity, or credibility of a witness. . . . However, a ruling on evidence of a collateral matter but intended to affect the credibility of a witness falls within the discretion of a trial court, and absent an abuse of discretion, a trial court’s ruling on such evidence is not grounds for reversal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Lewis““ ‘To constitute one an accomplice he must take some part in the crime, perform some act, or owe some duty to the person in danger that makes it incumbent on him to prevent the commission of the crime. Mere presence, acquiescence, or silence, in the absence of a duty to act, is not enough, however reprehensible it may be, to constitute one an accomplice. The knowledge that a crime is being or is about to be committed cannot be said to constitute one an accomplice ....’””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mason“defendant and his wife both ... gave oral permission for the investigating officers to search their residence for a gun,” the consent covered search in”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Regels v. Giardono
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.