State v. McCray’s Empirical Analysis
1975
Citation profile
5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 1989
most recently cited
5 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Moore v. United States · United States v. Young · State v. Kendall · Parker · State v. Cowman
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“When lack of preparation is asserted as the basis of denial of proper representation, the entire record must be examined and the totality of the circumstances evaluated to determine counsel’s effectiveness * * * [citing authorities]. The test is whether in all the circumstances counsel’s performance was within the range of normal competency. Moore v. United States, 432 F.2d 730, 737 (3 Cir. 1970). To warrant finding a deprivation of due process, such circumstances must include “an affirmative factual basis demonstrating counsel’s inadequacy of representation.” In re Parker, 423 F.2d 1021, 1025 (8 Cir.1970).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Watt
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.