Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 Or. 317 - State v. Russell

State v. Russell’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
November 1972
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"We find no authority in a criminal trial to amend the pleadings to conform to the proof as is done in civil cases. Cf. ORS 16.630. The overwhelming weight of authority is to the contrary. State v. Moyer, 76 Or. 396 , 149 P. 84 (1915); see Annotation, 101 A.L.R. 1254 . The time to amend the substantial facts alleged in an indictment is while the indictment is before the grand jury. * *"”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.