Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 Or. App. 69 - State v. Worth

231 Or. App. 69 - State v. Worth’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
December 2024
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"[T]he trial court erred in overruling defendant's objections to the prosecutor's misstatements of the law. Moreover, the court did not appear to recognize that it had erred in doing so and, accordingly, did not exercise its discretion to correct its erroneous rulings. Because, under the circumstances, the effect of those errors was to deny defendant a fair trial, the court's decision to deny defendant's motion for a mistrial did not fall within the range of legally correct choices and did not produce a permissible, legally correct outcome."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “fails to exercise discretion, refuses to exercise discretion[,] or fails to make a record which reflects an exercise of discretion”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.