Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 So. 2d 475 - Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stack

231 So. 2d 475 - Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Stack’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
2
states following
October 2006
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently October 2006

4 state decisions

2019691970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Rocks v. Brosius · 192 So. 2d 409 - Gilchrist Tractor Company v. Stribling · Banks v. City of Ardmore · Doss Oil Royalty Co. v. Lahman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““We think the intent of the parties, as demonstrated by their actions, was that the farm-out letter of December 10, 1959, and the assignment of December 11, 1959, together constituted the contract and agreement between the parties. The farm-out letter was not merged into nor superseded by the assignment.” 231 So.2d at 481.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““Mrs. Stack and A. F. Chisholm had actual notice of the farm-out letter of December 10, 1959, so the decision of this lawsuit will affect and determine their interests.” 231 So.2d at 480.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““The judgment dismissing the amended bill of complaint is reversed and this cause remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent with this opinion.” 231 So.2d at 482.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.