Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 231 SW2D 1006 - Burnaman v. Heaton

Burnaman v. Heaton’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
July 1964
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Wyss v. Bookman · Johnson v. Sweeney · Behrens v. Behrens · Manowitz v. Gaenslen · Armstrong v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““These cases are good authority for the proposition that even though a settlement agreement is announced in open court, if it is not reduced to writing, signed and filed among the papers of the case, or is not recorded in the minutes of the court, it can not be the basis for the rendition of a judgment at a later date where a dispute arises as to the existence of the agreement or as to its terms.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.